Indiscriminate deforestation, rapid industrialization, rampant construction, and unprecedented
increase in fossil fuel-run vehicles have contributed to the alarming levels of environmental
pollution globally. These environmental threats are becoming a significant societal risk factor.
The continuous rise in the environmental pollution in the last two decades has been
predominantly ascribed to the industrial activities (Pahuja, 2007). The industries operate in
the society utilizing the environmental resources, thereby creating a non-separable relationship
amongst corporate, stakeholders and the environment through their interaction (Tinker et al.,
1991; Owen et al., 1997; Lehman, 2001; Everett, 2004; and Cooper et al., 2005). The
humankind, as a result, is demanding an environmentally responsible behavior on the part of
businesses (Dillard et al., 2005) to reduce the damage caused by their actions and protect the
resources and environment (Sen et al., 2010). In response to the demands of the stakeholders,
some of the organizations are taking up various initiatives to curtail the environmental
degradation, while some critics suggest that many corporations are not actively managing their
environmental impacts and any such environmental reporting is legitimating or ‘green wash’
(Sen et al., 2010, p. 96). The government and regulatory bodies are also actively participating
by framing rules pertaining to environmental issues to minimize the adverse environmental
impacts caused by these organizations. In recent times, governments of different countries
have been taking the help of environmental management graduates, and this has led to the
increase in demand for such graduates. Due to the rising demand, environmental management
has become an integral part of management pedagogy across the globe.
Various courses related to environmental management like environmental economics and
management, environmental management, environmental marketing, environmental law,
environmental management systems, green management, energy and corporate social
responsibility, business ethics and sustainable development are being offered by different
management institutions. In spite of the availability of several courses relating to environmental
management education, the inclusion of Environmental Accounting as a subject in management
education will be of immense use to all the stakeholders, as accounting education is a channel
between academic research, policy making, technical and theoretical accounting developments,
theories of pedagogy, and interdisciplinary insights into sustainable development and practices
(Editorial, 2010). There is a recognition by practitioners, academics, business and political
communities that accounting may have a role in helping corporations reorient their business
actions to augment their awareness of how they interact with (and damage) the biosphere
(Bebbington et al., 1994). Environmental accounting offers potential not only to develop
critical insight into the practice of and analytic engagement with accounting practice, but it
also could work as an instrument for changing accountants’ behavior in practice (Gray et al.,
1994; and Gibson, 1997 cited in De Aguiar and Fearfull, 2010, p. 65). The integration of
social and environmental accounting into traditional accounting subjects can be advantageous
(Sefick et al., 1997). One problem with how the corporate sector deals with social and
environmental accounting is the delegation of environmental responsibilities to environment
and sustainability managers (Sundin, 2010). This approach may create conflicts between senior
managers as they do not possess sufficient understanding of ecological issues and what could
and should be done to reduce environmental impacts (Sundin and Wainwright, 2010, p. 84).
The incorporation of environmental accounting, as a subject, in the course curriculum of
management education can help to equip the future managers to be conversant with different
perspectives of environmental accounting (Pattanayak et al., 2011). All managers (with a
background in environmental accounting) may then better understand the conflicts in resource
allocation decisions when attempting to satisfy multiple financial and non-financial stakeholder
interests (Sundin and Wainwright, 2010, p. 85).
|